HR 1770 — Congress 119
Consumer Safety Technology Act
Official source: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/1770
Congress.gov subjects: Advanced technology and technological innovations; Advisory bodies; Computers and information technology; Consumer affairs; Currency; Fraud offenses and financial crimes; Commerce
Issues impacted: Regulation & Agency Oversight (ai, high), Criminal Justice & Public Safety (ai, high), Inflation & Cost of Living (congress_subject, high)
Official bill text (stored)
Plain-text extraction from Congress.gov text formats. Canonical source remains the official URL above. Full text is prioritized for bills with roll-call votes.
119 HR 1770 IH: Consumer Safety Technology Act U.S. House of Representatives 2025-03-03 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1770 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 3, 2025 Mr. Soto (for himself, Ms. Castor of Florida , and Mrs. Trahan ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce A BILL To direct the Consumer Product Safety Commission to establish a pilot program to explore the use of artificial intelligence in support of the mission of the Commission and to direct the Secretary of Commerce and the Federal Trade Commission to study and report on the use of blockchain technology and tokens, respectively. 1. Short title; table of contents (a) Short title This Act may be cited as the Consumer Safety Technology Act . (b) Table of contents The table of contents for this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. Sec. 2. Definitions. Title I—Artificial Intelligence and Consumer Product Safety Sec. 101. Short title. Sec. 102. Pilot program for use of artificial intelligence by Consumer Product Safety Commission. Title II—Blockchain Technology Innovation Sec. 201. Short title. Sec. 202. Study on blockchain technology and its use in consumer protection. Title III—Token Taxonomy Sec. 301. Short title. Sec. 302. Findings. Sec. 303. Report on unfair or deceptive acts or practices in transactions relating to tokens. 2. Definitions In this Act— (1) the term consumer product has the meaning given such term in section 3(a) of the Consumer Product Safety Act ( 15 U.S.C. 2052(a) ); (2) the term Secretary means the Secretary of Commerce; and (3) the term token means a transferrable, digital representation of information recorded on a blockchain or other distributed ledger technology. I Artificial Intelligence and Consumer Product Safety 101. Short title This title may be cited as the AI for Consumer Product Safety Act . 102. Pilot program for use of artificial intelligence by Consumer Product Safety Commission (a) Establishment Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Consumer Product Safety Commission shall establish a pilot program to explore the use of artificial intelligence by the Commission in support of the consumer product safety mission of the Commission, as described in section 2(b) of the Consumer Product Safety Act ( 15 U.S.C. 2051(b) ). (b) Requirements In conducting the pilot program established under subsection (a), the Commission shall do the following: (1) Use artificial intelligence for at least 1 of the following purposes: (A) Tracking trends with respect to injuries involving consumer products. (B) Identifying consumer product hazards. (C) Monitoring the retail marketplace (including internet websites) for the sale of recalled consumer products (including both new and used products). (D) Identifying consumer products required by section 17(a) of the Consumer Product Safety Act ( 15 U.S.C. 2066(a) ) to be refused admission into the customs territory of the United States. (2) Consistent with section 6 of the Consumer Product Safety Act ( 15 U.S.C. 2055 ), consult with the following: (A) Technologists, data scientists, and experts in artificial intelligence and machine learning. (B) Cybersecurity experts. (C) Members of the retail industry. (D) Consumer product manufacturers. (E) Consumer product safety organizations. (F) Any other person the Commission considers appropriate. (c) Report to Congress Not later than 1 year after the conclusion of the pilot program established under subsection (a), the Consumer Product Safety Commission shall submit to the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, and make publicly available on the website of the Commission, a report on the findings and data derived from such program, including the extent to which the use of artificial intelligence improved the ability of the Commission to advance the consumer product safety mission of the Commission. II Blockchain Technology Innovation 201. Short title This title may be cited as the Blockchain Innovation Act . 202. Study on blockchain technology and its use in consumer protection (a) In general (1) Study required Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the Federal Trade Commission and any other Federal agency the Secretary determines appropriate, shall complete a study on the possible uses of blockchain technology for consumer protection purposes, including preventing or mitigating fraud and other unfair or deceptive acts or practices. (2) Requirements for study In conducting the study required by paragraph (1), the Secretary shall examine— (A) existing and emerging uses of blockchain technology that could help protect consumers, including by preventing or mitigating fraud and other unfair or deceptive acts or practices within the meaning of section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act ( 15 U.S.C. 45 ); (B) trends in the commercial use of and investment in blockchain technology to prevent or mitigate fraud and other unfair or deceptive acts or practices as described in subparagraph (A); (C) best practices in facilitating public-private partnerships in blockchain technology to prevent or mitigate fraud and other unfair or deceptive acts or practices as described in subparagraph (A); (D) potential benefits and risks related to the use of blockchain technology to prevent or mitigate fraud and other unfair or deceptive acts or practices as described in subparagraph (A); (E) possible modifications to Federal regulations that could encourage the use of blockchain technology to prevent or mitigate fraud and other unfair or deceptive acts or practices as described in subparagraph (A); and (F) any other relevant observations or recommendations related to the use of blockchain technology for consumer protection purposes, including preventing or mitigating fraud and other unfair or deceptive acts or practices as described in subparagraph (A). (3) Public comment In conducting the study required by paragraph (1), the Secretary shall provide opportunity for public comment and advice relevant to conducting the study. (b) Report to Congress Not later than 6 months after the completion of the study required by subsection (a)(1), the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, and make publicly available on the website of the Department of Commerce, a report that contains the results of such study. III Token Taxonomy 301. Short title This title may be cited as the Digital Taxonomy Act . 302. Findings Congress finds that— (1) it is important that the United States remains a leader in innovation; (2) tokens and blockchain technology are driving innovation and providing consumers with increased choice and convenience; (3) the use of tokens and blockchain technology is likely to increase in the future; (4) the Federal Trade Commission is responsible for protecting consumers from unfair or deceptive acts or practices, including relating to tokens; (5) the Commission has previously taken action against unscrupulous companies and individuals that committed unfair or deceptive acts or practices involving tokens; and (6) to bolster the Commission’s ability to enforce against unfair or deceptive acts or practices involving tokens, the Commission should ensure staff have appropriate training and resources to identify and pursue such cases. 303. Report on unfair or deceptive acts or practices in transactions relating to tokens Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Federal Trade Commission shall submit to the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, and make publicly available on the website of the Commission, a report on— (1) any actions taken by the Commission relating to unfair or deceptive acts or practices in transactions relating to tokens; (2) any other efforts of the Commission to prevent unfair or deceptive acts or practices relating to tokens; and (3) any recommendations by the Commission for legislation that would improve the ability of the Commission and other relevant Federal agencies to further protect consumers from unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the token marketplace.
Plain-English summary
Confidence: high · Complexity: moderate · Model: grok-4.5
This bill asks a few federal agencies to try out or study new tech tools that could help keep shoppers safer.
First, the Consumer Product Safety Commission would start a pilot program within a year. They’d use artificial intelligence—computer systems that spot patterns—for at least one job: tracking injury trends from everyday products, finding product hazards, watching stores and websites for recalled stuff (new or used), or flagging products that shouldn’t enter the country. They’d talk with tech experts, cybersecurity folks, retailers, makers, and safety groups, then report what worked to Congress.
Second, the Secretary of Commerce (working with the Federal Trade Commission and maybe others) would study whether blockchain—the shared digital ledger tech behind crypto—could help stop fraud and shady business practices that hurt consumers. The study would look at real uses, money going into the field, public-private teamwork ideas, upsides and risks, and whether any rules should change. Public comments would be welcome, and a report would follow.
Third, the FTC would report within a year on what it’s already done about unfair or deceptive deals involving “tokens” (transferable digital bits of info on a blockchain). It would also share other efforts and any ideas for new laws to better protect people in that space.
Everyday shoppers, online buyers, and folks in product safety or crypto-adjacent businesses might notice the studies and pilot results once they’re public. The bill itself doesn’t rewrite safety rules or ban anything—it mainly funds learning and a test run.
Related issues
How a vote maps to positions
Impartial mapping: which issue position a Yea vs Nay advances. When a bill has multiple floor votes, each roll can have its own mapping. Bill-level entries (no roll listed) apply as a default when a roll has no specific map. Used for legislator alignment.
All rolls (bill default)
| Issue | Yea advances | Nay advances | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regulation & Agency Oversight | Process, transparency, and reporting | Limit new reporting and disclosure mandates | A yea vote advances CPSC AI pilot reporting, Commerce blockchain study with public comment, and FTC token marketplace reporting—oversight and transparency process rather than CRA nullification or broad deregulation. No catalog position cleanly maps to opposing these studies and pilots. |
| Criminal Justice & Public Safety | Targeted tools and interdiction capacity | Status quo / reject this change | A yea vote supports AI tools for CPSC hazard/recall/import monitoring and blockchain/token studies aimed at fraud and unfair practices—targeted tech and interdiction capacity without new penalty structures. Opposing the pilots/studies does not map cleanly to tougher-penalties, sentencing reform, or treatment-focused catalog positions. |